I wholeheartedly agree with this commenter, and the actual article, if you can believe it!
I will reread the article, but I honestly can’t really find anything here that I detect as something harmful for a child.
I don’t really like how Mr. Pearl states that a child isn’t fit to go somewhere with such a “nice looking family”, because I think that is inconsiderate and disrespectfully stated, but otherwise, I can’t find fault. Personally, I would simply state to the child that wherever the family is headed requires a certain type of clothing, and since the child did not have the proper type of clothing because he/she had not completed his/her task of whatever laundry they were responsible for, then accompanying the family would have to wait until the next opportunity.
Follow
Mr Pearl has said a number of things that I agree with. But the parts I disagree with are so egregious, that I am forced to disavow their teachings as a whole. A broken clock is right twice a day, but I wouldn’t consult it for the time.
I love how you’ve said that… the clock will be correct twice a day even if broken.
And the clock will go on thinking it is functioning perfectly, because it is still a clock. It does not know it is not functioning.